Ouch talk disability attraction and dating
I've rewritten the lead to comply with WP: LEAD, and Elonka helped move a lot of extraneous information to daughter articles. I want more comments to help me edit to eventually get to that point, which you have provided. Since Soap Opera Digest uses DAYS and not Days, yes, I do think that needs a citation. :) --Elonka , 6 July 2007 (UTC) Previous peer review: 10 September 2006 We have done quite a bit of work updating this article based on the points raised in the previous peer review.If any of you have edited television articles and moved them to higher standard, that would also be a plus in helping us. Let me read over them and see what I can do about everything. Please tell me where it switches and how we should do it uniformly. Before submitting it as a GAC or FAC, I'd like one more round of comments to try to make that process go as smoothly as possible. Error Banner.fade_out.modal_overlay.modal_overlay .modal_wrapper.modal_overlay [email protected](max-width:630px)@media(max-width:630px).modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:before.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:before.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:before.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:hover:before. Selector .selector_input_interaction .selector_input. Selector .selector_input_interaction .selector_spinner. Sorry for doing this after peer review is already underway: I just got inspired.Drewcifer3000 , 15 June 2007 (UTC) old peer review This article is a bit of a mess; I've done my best to at least get it up to civilised standard, but it will need a major cleanup.
Anomie , 16 June 2007 (UTC) "launch titles" section is a bit over-short; I'd expand it or merge it into another section. CJ , (UTC) Since this article has reached WP: GA and there's no point making this request again, please offer advice on getting this article to WP: FA. Special Windler , (UTC) Honestly, had I reviewed this for GAC, I would have easily passed it. Please leaves some comments if there is room for improvement. Drewcifer3000 , 9 June 2007 (UTC) Done Fixed all of the issues above, except when contained within a direct quote (such as the its vs it's and one instance of "rock 'n' roll").
Days should be the uniform throughout the entire article, just to be simple. I've also addressed the issues raised by the lazy automatic reviewer.
There are three points remaining: Please be as specific as possible in your suggestions. Anomie , 10 June 2007 (UTC) With all the extra references I've added while waiting for someone to respond to this review, it now triggers a "summary style" warning from the automatic reviewer for being over 50 KB.
This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become featured article candidates, or did not follow the "How to use this page" principles in some way.
If one of your requests has been moved here by mistake, please accept our apologies and copy it back to the main Peer review page with your signature (~~~~).
Should not be linked to blogs (which are unreliable sources) and the tags (neutrality, etc.) need clearing.